Industrial materials · B2B buying guide

PAC Grade Selection for Industrial Wastewater

Industrial PAC selection works best when product data and the actual wastewater are reviewed together. We compare proposed grades on a clear Al2O3 and basicity basis, then the treatment outcome you need. A controlled water trial makes the cost comparison useful without assuming that a higher headline content is always better.

Discuss this applicationExplore grade candidates
Define the requirement→Compare the grade→Review a trial
Material and application samples
Material and application samples
01 / 10
Your priorities

The Buying Brief

01

Water

Relevant quality and target

02

PAC

Al2O3 reporting basis

03

Basicity

Separate value and method

04

Outcome

Treatment, sludge and actual cost

ONE APPLICATION · FOUR CONNECTED CHECKS
Use the same requirement and reporting basis for each candidate.
02 / 10
Material focus

PAC Composition Before Treatment Comparison

The catalogue includes PAC entries with 28% and 30% Al2O3 designations, plus an industrial entry whose 30% content basis still needs definition. A percentage labelled as alumina cannot also stand in for a measured basicity result. We resolve the offered composition before comparing candidates on your wastewater.

Close view of the proposed material form
Close view of the proposed material form
03 / 10
Grade comparison

PAC Fields That Need Separate Answers

Review areaCatalogue detail and comparison basis
Alumina contentThe 6067 and 6053 entries show 28% / 30% Al2O3 designations; confirm the actual offered grade and reporting basis.
BasicityObtain its own measured value and method. An Al2O3 figure appearing in this field does not define basicity.
Product pHThe listed 3.5–5.0 range needs the preparation concentration and method; it is not an influent operating window.
Industrial 30% entryProduct 6320 leaves its content basis to confirm. Define the analyte before any normalized price comparison.
Listed figures describe catalogue entries. Agree the actual offered specification and measurement basis.
04 / 10
Actual catalogue references

Catalogue Starting Points

Use these listed candidates to start a grade-specific discussion with us.

01
Catalogue reference 6067
PAC powder, 30% Al2O3 grade enquiry
28% / 30% alumina designations; actual offered grade to define.
Open the grade details →
02
Catalogue reference 6053
Yellow PAC for treatment evaluation
Alumina content and measured basicity to review separately.
Open the grade details →
03
Catalogue reference 6320
Industrial light-yellow PAC powder
30% content designation with analytical basis to confirm.
Open the grade details →
Candidate entries are a starting point; the agreed specification and relevant evaluation support approval.
Explore the related material family05 / 10
Your trial and acceptance

A Trial on Your Water

Have your technical team define a controlled jar-test comparison for the actual wastewater. Record the relevant clarified-water results and sludge observations alongside pH and the sample identity. Jar-test findings support plant evaluation; they do not automatically reproduce every full-scale condition.

Application components for a grade review
Application components for a grade review
06 / 10
Decision controls

Selection Priorities

Check 01

Compare the real water

Use representative wastewater and record its relevant pH, alkalinity and treatment targets.

Check 02

Keep the trial controlled

Record the sample, actual dose basis, mixing and settling conditions and the endpoints agreed by your team.

Check 03

Include the process costs

Compare accepted treatment, chemical use, sludge and any relevant adjustment costs together.

Resolve the relevant gaps before extending a sample result into a supply decision.
07 / 10
From sample to supply

Cost Tied to the Outcome

For a composition-only comparison, one tonne at a confirmed 28% Al2O3 contains 280 kg of that reported component, while 30% contains 300 kg. This arithmetic helps compare content cost, not operating dose or removal efficiency. Use the actual water trial to decide the economical grade.

Sample and packaging preparation
Sample and packaging preparation
08 / 10
Connected guidance

The Next Decision

COMPARE
Read PAC content and trial fundamentals
REFINE
Review grade documents
CONTINUE
Sample & Grade Evaluation: From Trials to Repeat Orders
Continue with the route relevant to your project.
09 / 10
Work with us

Start with Your Material Brief

Send us the details below to review a concrete grade proposal and the next evaluation step.

Representative water informationTreatment targetsCurrent PACContent and basicity requirementsTrial plan
Requirement brief → grade discussion → relevant sample review.
Plan an Industrial PAC Grade ComparisonEmail the material brief
Read the SDS, TDS and COA guide · Explore all buying guides

Qingdao Relia Industries Co., Ltd. · China calcium carbonate manufacturing and industrial material enquiries.

10 / 10