XM-A101 Titanium Dioxide Additive for Paint-Performance Trials, 96–98.5% TiO2 Industrial White Powder
-
ColorWhitePhysical formPowder
-
CAS No.13462-67-7Purity96%~98.5%
-
Model NumberXM-A101Appearancewhite Powder
-
Applicationplastic coating paint printing inkClassificationTitanium Dioxide
-
Grade StandardIndustrial GradeMolecular FormulaTiO2
-
Other Namestio2CertificationISO9001
-
HS code3206111000Package25kg/bag
-
PH Value6.5-8.5TiO2 Content96~98.5%
-
Oil Absorption21~26Residue on sieve 45 μm %0.03~0.05
-
Matter volatile at 105°C %0.3~0.5Tinting strength %95~109
-
SampleFreely Provided
XM-A101 is an industrial titanium dioxide white powder for paint, coatings, plastics and printing ink. A 96–98.5% TiO2 content and several defined physical-test ranges provide material criteria for a trial; an improvement in paint performance must be established in the actual formulation.
Turn the paint target into an acceptance test
For XM-A101, identify the paint binder and the colour, dispersion or application outcome the project requires. The titanium dioxide name does not select a crystal form or surface treatment, so obtain the offered grade information before deciding whether the pigment is a suitable trial candidate.
Interpret tinting strength with its reference
The stated XM-A101 tinting-strength range is 95–109%, which needs its method and comparison reference to support a meaningful pigment comparison. Check that basis alongside the 96–98.5% TiO2 criterion, since chemical content and a relative colour-strength test describe different properties.
- Request the actual XM-A101 grade and applicable chemical-identity documents.
- Confirm the 0.03–0.05% residue criterion on a 45 micron sieve and its test method.
- Agree the 0.3–0.5% volatile-matter test at 105°C and the batch acceptance basis.
Qualify XM-A101 in the selected binder
The pH range of 6.5–8.5 is another comparison criterion when the preparation and measurement conditions are consistent. Use current analysis, safety documentation and a representative paint trial to judge the actual result; plastic or ink applications need separate evaluation, and any certification requirement needs its own applicable evidence.
For this XM-A101 enquiry, link the requested paint outcome to a documented pigment grade and defined test references, so that the formulation result is assessed through evidence rather than an unmeasured enhancement claim.
