XM-BA45 Natural Barium Sulphate Powder, 92–94% BaSO4, for Coatings and Polymers

Share
Product description
  • Color
    White
    Physical form
    Powder
  • CAS No.
    13462-86-7
    Purity
    92-94
  • Appearance
    White Powder
    Application
    Powder coatings, Plastics, Rubber, Painting
  • Classification
    Sulphate
    Grade Standard
    Industrial Grade
  • Molecular Formula
    BaSO4
    Type
    Barium Sulfate
  • Model Number
    XM-BA45
    BaSO4 Content (%)
    92~94
  • D50 (μm)
    10
    D97 (μm)
    25
  • Whiteness (%)
    88
    PH value
    7~9
  • Oil Absorption (g/100g)
    13-15
    Specific Gravity (g/cm³)
    4.35

The particle profile is an important part of an XM-BA45 comparison. This white industrial natural barium sulphate powder has stated BaSO4 content of 92–94%, a D50 of 10 μm and a D97 of 25 μm. Powder coatings, plastics, rubber and painting are its named application directions.

Keep the median and upper distribution separate

Read D50 and D97 as distinct points in the measured particle distribution. Neither should be relabelled as a maximum particle size. When comparing XM-BA45 with another natural mineral, request matching methods and sample-preparation details so that the figures answer the same technical question.

Compare colour and composition independently

The stated whiteness is 88%, while the stated BaSO4 content is 92–94%. Whiteness describes a different measurement from composition and needs its own test basis. Ask which result matters to the chosen formulation before treating either number as a selection advantage.

Powder chemistry check
The stated pH range is 7–9; retain the test method with the analysis.
Liquid-demand comparison
Request the oil-absorption method and assess its relevance to the actual binder or polymer process.

Qualify the selected coating or polymer system

Set the processing and finished-product criteria before running the natural powder sample. Evaluate the result in the intended coating, plastic or rubber formulation rather than assuming a universal replacement ratio. Current grade analysis and a controlled comparison provide a stronger basis for acceptance than a broad high-content description.