Industrial Calcium Carbonate Powder, 800 Mesh, 96% Purity, for Rubber and Filler Qualification Enquiries

Share
Product description
  • Particle-size designation
    Mesh designation
    Color
    White
  • Physical form
    Powder
  • CAS No.
    471-34-1
    Purity
    96%
  • Appearance
    white powder
    Application
    Paper industry ,Coatings Industry,as a filler
  • Classification
    Carbonate
    EINECS No.
    207-439-9
  • Grade Standard
    Industrial Grade
    Molecular Formula
    caco3
  • Type
    Calcium Carbonate

An 800mesh choice identifies this industrial calcium carbonate for rubber-compound enquiries. The material is described as white powder with stated purity of 96%; paper and coating filler applications are also named, with each use requiring its own qualification criteria.

Define the rubber compound being considered

Describe the elastomer system, processing requirements and finished properties that the evaluation must address. Keep the powder specification with that brief. A calcium carbonate name and mesh designation do not establish a reinforcing effect, cure response or suitable addition level for the intended compound.

Request evidence for the actual 800mesh powder

Obtain the sieve method and particle distribution, together with confirmation of any surface treatment. Review the current assay and matched technical and safety documentation. Do not infer a distribution percentile, numerical whiteness or particular surface chemistry from the mesh option or white appearance.

Keep secondary enquiries separate

If the proposed use concerns paper or coatings, define that formulation and its acceptance requirements independently. A result from one binder or process should remain attached to the system in which it was obtained.

Retain a useful material comparison record

Assess a representative sample using agreed methods and document the actual powder and formulation identifiers. Review the required process and finished-system observations before deciding whether further qualification is justified. No universal performance improvement is established here. Keep the test conditions and material reports with the result so a repeat enquiry can distinguish the same evaluated powder from a changed grade or application scope.

You Might Also Like