Calcium Oxide CaO 90%-93% Quicklime White Powder for Flue Gas Desulfurization Evaluation
-
ColorWhitePhysical formPowder
-
CAS No.1305-78-8Purity90%-93%
-
Appearancewhite powderApplicationFlue Gas Desulfurization
-
ClassificationCalcium OxideEINECS No.215-138-9
-
Grade StandardIndustrial GradeMolecular FormulaCaO
-
Other NamesQuicklime
A flue-gas-desulfurization enquiry should identify the plant's raw-material requirements before comparing lime samples. This calcium oxide quicklime is an industrial white powder with a stated 90%-93% purity range. It is a candidate for technical assessment against that specification, rather than a promise about emissions performance.
Build the CaO comparison around the plant specification
Describe the intended equipment and the material acceptance criteria relevant to the enquiry. The named application gives the discussion a direction, but it does not establish equipment compatibility or a particular removal result. The proposed sample must still be qualified for that system.
Keep assay, particles and reactivity as distinct evidence
Request batch analysis for the stated purity and the particle distribution for the actual grade. Any reactivity information should identify its test basis. These measurements answer different questions and should be compared separately rather than compressed into one broad high-purity description.
- Match the chemical assay to the plant's required material limits.
- Check the grade-specific particle and relevant reactivity documents.
- Use the agreed sample assessment to decide material acceptance.
Make the sample record identify calcium oxide clearly
The supplied identity is calcium oxide, CaO, also named quicklime, with CAS 1305-78-8. Keep that identity and the industrial white-powder form attached to the analysis and handling documents. It gives purchasing and technical reviewers the same material reference throughout the enquiry.
A chemical assay alone does not establish an operating rate, desulfurization efficiency or an emissions-compliance outcome. Those decisions depend on the plant's own evidence and qualified process assessment. Request that evidence as part of the technical discussion before accepting a substitution.
